quire

scheduling experiment

tinkering with fragile schedules

quire visualizations page: fragility index plotted across eight terms, climbing from 26 in fall 2023 to 53 in fall 2026, then dropping sharply to a live computed Spring 2027 dot. Funding impact panel below totals $3.34M term cost.

A direct-manipulation cascading change visualizer for an academic schedule. Click any class — adjust it. Click any faculty — release a section, full sabbatical, leave, retirement, target load, preferences. Adjustments stack. 

The fixture is invented.  Imagined faculty in a design school, eighty sections, twenty-one rooms, a Spring 2027 term with four sections still TBD on day one. None of it is real. The shape wants to be. Tenure-line miss their target loads if you don't watch them. Lecturers cost more when you ask them to overload…

triage

A brief input — release someone, off one section, sabbatical, leave — returns three plans for the same disruption. One minimizes total perturbation. One protects day, time, course, and room preferences for tenure-line above all else. One spreads the burden across the lecturer pool with a single-section cap per person. Each plan reports its own metrics: total moves, induced preference strain, an equity index on extra load, hires posted, dollar delta. Apply commits. Preview tries it on the calendar grid first, with a banner offering keep or revert.

A small research shelf under the nav carries the literature any of those strategies leans on. 

open quire

Launch the demo
Runs in your browser. No install, no account, no telemetry. State lives in the tab.
Best on a wide screen. The grid is a four-column day chart; the brief surface stacks plan cards three across.
Not a product. An experiment, kept small on purpose.
Cost figures. Imagined base salaries plus overload at $10k per extra section. No benefits, no total cost of employment.